|
Post by ylevental on Nov 2, 2015 18:39:21 GMT
So I know that this doesn't sound like a form of government that Autistics prefer but my ideal anarchy would involve voluntary order, where people can do what they want as long as they don't interfere with others. I feel that it will be possible if we are technologically developed enough in the future.
I just don't like any of the candidates for this election. Bernie Sanders makes impossible promises and brags about himself, Clinton/Bush are too traditional, Trump only cares about himself, and Ben Carson is too religious and despite his supposed intelligence, has made stupid mistakes in his points.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 2, 2015 21:06:18 GMT
I vote for global nuclear annihilation. Don't give us any warning, just press the buttons and send us all instantly to oblivion. That would end all the litter, pollution, population, road building, ideological and religious problems permanently.
Think of all the billions that have been spent on the development and production of nuclear missiles, it seems like a criminal waste to spend all that money if nobody is going to use the things. We could all go out in style, with the biggest fireworks display the Earth has seen since the asteroid that wiped out the dinosaurs.
|
|
|
Post by sigbold on Nov 3, 2015 11:42:01 GMT
So I know that this doesn't sound like a form of government that Autistics prefer but my ideal anarchy would involve voluntary order, where people can do what they want as long as they don't interfere with others. I feel that it will be possible if we are technologically developed enough in the future. And what is the solution for those who do not follow said voluntary order? It seems to me that there would still be need for some kind of outside enforcement of order, because it is unlikely that everyone will play by the rules.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 3, 2015 12:14:06 GMT
And what is the solution for those who do not follow said voluntary order? Nuke them out of existence
|
|
|
Post by ylevental on Nov 3, 2015 15:31:42 GMT
So I know that this doesn't sound like a form of government that Autistics prefer but my ideal anarchy would involve voluntary order, where people can do what they want as long as they don't interfere with others. I feel that it will be possible if we are technologically developed enough in the future. And what is the solution for those who do not follow said voluntary order? It seems to me that there would still be need for some kind of outside enforcement of order, because it is unlikely that everyone will play by the rules. I don't know, but people can't be disorderly eternally
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 3, 2015 15:56:14 GMT
The whole definition of Anarchy is disorder, chaos
|
|
|
Post by ylevental on Nov 3, 2015 16:25:57 GMT
The whole definition of Anarchy is disorder, chaos That is a common stereotype, but it technically means society "without rulers" or "without leaders." Chaos is not necessary.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 3, 2015 17:12:12 GMT
anarchy ˈanəki/ noun noun: anarchy
1. a state of disorder due to absence or non-recognition of authority or other controlling systems. "he must ensure public order in a country threatened with anarchy" synonyms: lawlessness, absence of government, nihilism, mobocracy, revolution, insurrection, riot, rebellion, mutiny, disorder, disorganization, misrule, chaos, tumult, turmoil, mayhem, pandemonium "the country is threatened with anarchy" antonyms: government, order 2. absence of government and absolute freedom of the individual, regarded as a political ideal.
|
|
|
Post by ylevental on Nov 3, 2015 18:08:32 GMT
anarchy ˈanəki/ noun noun: anarchy 1. a state of disorder due to absence or non-recognition of authority or other controlling systems. "he must ensure public order in a country threatened with anarchy" synonyms: lawlessness, absence of government, nihilism, mobocracy, revolution, insurrection, riot, rebellion, mutiny, disorder, disorganization, misrule, chaos, tumult, turmoil, mayhem, pandemonium "the country is threatened with anarchy" antonyms: government, order 2. absence of government and absolute freedom of the individual, regarded as a political ideal. The two definitions can be both used in different cases. I was using the second one.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 3, 2015 18:11:36 GMT
I was using the first
|
|
max
New Member
Posts: 31
|
Post by max on Nov 3, 2015 21:45:43 GMT
No, I would rather have a strong socialist state, that takes care of everyone. I don’t like any of the candidates either, because they are all rightwing corporate oligarchists. Including the Democrats.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 4, 2015 0:11:47 GMT
“Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies.”
Groucho Marx
|
|
|
Post by kraftiekortie on Nov 6, 2015 6:31:43 GMT
I'm not into anarchy at all.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 6, 2015 15:18:19 GMT
Anarchy in the UK is okay, it would certainly be better than the current government.
|
|
|
Post by sigbold on Nov 7, 2015 16:10:12 GMT
And what is the solution for those who do not follow said voluntary order? It seems to me that there would still be need for some kind of outside enforcement of order, because it is unlikely that everyone will play by the rules. I don't know, but people can't be disorderly eternally
I am a bit more pessimistic. Anti-social elements are unlikely to stop acting like that unless forced by circumstances or dead. Therefore the reason for my question. And before I forget, those elements who do not agree with how society is organized and wish to change it trough violent means.
|
|